Anone case prosed: (4) That moral reasonable suspicion that general corruption exists
does not make it the less necessary to prove strictly that it exists in one particular case.
Jakine
the changes in their aver.
Change (a.)
Receiving $720 from
monthly
Jum
a Chinese form.
The best part of
the evidence is
mere hearsay sought not to be considered seriously. The entries
in the books
were not evidence
against Kelly at all. Be
Kago that the f tok.
the love oko
The material part of the
San is at ff 5+6 where he states that on dates occasions which he does not remember he made in the kitchen f 2001 de Voux Road. Later he can only stick to one occasion on which he
payments to Kelly
handed money to him.
Reading the shift
& doubtful statements
of this witness I don't believe him.
Shaye (b.)
Leung is
the best witness. (12302
ff (414)) that on one occasion he paid money to Kelly.
(413) He can
say certainly that
it was probably he that paid $10
As to Cheng Kwong.
She never made any posts p28 on the order
on the entries in the books are not evidence.
to Kelly of the
"Advertising" says
Trepped chaye, as not proved.
I think the
same as to chaye (b.)
Change c. Some note the abominable
leading questions put. I suffice he knew no better.
$21 by the Hewitt
Kelly admits having received all these goods.
He admits that he has not paid for them. Chan tat sing says that Kelly came & ordered the first have personally.
to have been ordered The other goods
by Hing's
firm accountant.
She
woman
not called
So the order was not perfectly proved but Kelly admits receipt.
good
It comes to this that Kelly ordered & did not pay for them. I think
proved.
this maybe regarded
It maybe improper conduct but it
dismissal.
does not justify
Chaye (d)
This is grotesque.
The
Effo
were paid
for in Ting (132) says the market price was
ten cents
certainly.
anone case prosed: (4) That moral recomable suspicion that general commption exists
does not make it the less re
recensary to prove strictly that it exists in one particular cage.
Jakine
the changes in their aver.
Change (a.)
Receiving 7$20 from
monthly
Jum
a chinese form.
The best part of
the evidence is
mere hearsay sought not tobe considered seriondly. The entues
in the books
whe not evidence.
against Kelly at all. Be
Kago that the f tok.
the love oko
The materal part of the
San is at tf 5+6 where he states that on dates roccasions which Le does not remember he made in the kitchen f 2001 de Voux Road. Later he can ong stick to one occasion on which be
payments to Kelly
hisonalghanded mongste him.
Reading the shift
& doubtful statements.
this witmen I dont believe him.
Shaye (6)
Leung in
is the rest witness. 12302
sos (414) that on one occasion be paid moresto Kelly.
Ste doc int remember
when. (413) Ste can
say certainly that
it was handbably be that paid $10 probaly
As to Cheng Kwong.
She never made my posts p28 on the onder
on the cities in the forks are not evidence. to Kelly of the
"Aftising & says
Trepped chaye, as not herved.
I think the
same as to chaye (b.)
Change c. Some note the abominable
leading questions put Isuffice he knew no better.
$21 bythe Hewitt
Kelly admits having received all there goods.
He admits that he has not fraid for them. Chan tat sting ways that helly came wordered the first have personally.
to have been ordered The other goods
19 Hing's
teem accountant.
Ste
woma
not called
So the order was not perfach froved but Kelly admits receipt.
good
It comes to this that Kelly ordered did mit pay for them. I think
proved.
this maybe regraded
It maybe improper conduct but it
dismissal. does not justify
Chaye(d)
This is grotesque.
The
Effo
were paid
forin Ting (132) says the market price bas
ten cer
certo.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.